Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research

A Quantitative Perspective on Surface Marker Selection for the Isolation of Functional Tumor Cells

Submit a Paper

Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research 2015:Suppl. 1 1-11


Published on 27 Jul 2015

DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S25461

Further metadata provided in PDF

Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research


Much effort has gone into developing fluid biopsies of patient peripheral blood for the monitoring of metastatic cancers. One common approach is to isolate and analyze tumor cells in the peripheral blood. Widespread clinical implementation of this approach has been hindered by the current choice of targeting epithelial markers known to be highly variable in primary tumor sites. Here, we review current antigen-based tumor cell isolation strategies and offer biological context for commonly studied cancer surface markers. Expression levels of the most common markers are quantitated for three breast cancer and two non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lineage models. These levels are contrasted with that present on healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) for comparison to expected background levels in a fluid biopsy setting. A key feature of this work is establishing a metric of markers per square micrometer. This describes an average marker density on the cell membrane surface, which is a critical metric for emerging isolation strategies. These results serve to extend expression of key tumor markers in a sensitive and dynamic manner beyond traditional positive/negative immunohistochemical staining to guide future fluid biopsy targeting strategies.




Supplementary Files 1   (149.63 KB DOCX FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


What Your Colleagues Say About Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research
I had a great experience publishing our paper in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. The editorial team is very friendly and helpful. I was updated frequently during the entire review and publishing process. The review process is very reasonable and fair. The editor in charge has good judgement on review comments. I would recommend this journal to any researchers who conduct breast cancer research.
Dr Yanfen Hu (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

New article and journal news notification services