Prior to the commencement of peer review, an initial assessment of your manuscript will be conducted to ensure that all required information is provided. Your paper will not be accepted for peer review until any problems identified have been addressed. Where problems are found, you will be contacted promptly. You will be given full information on how to remedy them, except in cases where the problem precludes further processing of your manuscript. This typically arises where manuscripts are determined to be outside the scope of the journal.
It is an unfortunate fact that instances of author misconduct are increasing and while we see relatively few instances of this, we are obliged to assess all incoming manuscripts carefully. Each initial assessment covers approximately twenty different points including the following:
1. Verification of authors’ details
2. Ensuring that the paper is within the scope of the journal and suitable for peer review
3. Evaluation paper for possible plagiarism or duplicate publication (also known as self-plagiarism)
4. Ensuring all information needed by peer reviewers and editorial decision-maker is present
This list is not exhaustive and is subject to change. If no problems arise from the initial assessment, your manuscript will proceed to peer review.
Responding to Requests by Staff
Staff contact information is provided at the end of the manuscript submission process. Please ensure that you read and respond promptly to any emails received from staff; failure to respond to emails at this stage will create processing delays and may lead to manuscript processing being halted.
Using My Author Portal and Receiving Email Status Updates
During the manuscript submission process you will be provided with a My Author Portal account. My Author Portal is our gateway for authors, reviewers, and editorial contributors. It can be used by authors to track the status of submitted manuscripts. It is also used to resubmit revised manuscripts and during the production process.
My Author Portal login details are provided by email during the submission process unless you had an account prior to manuscript submission. If you did not receive the email, please use the password retrieval function.
You will be notified by email of any changes in the status of your submission. If you do not receive updates for an extended period, login to My Author Portal and verify that your email address is correct. If it is correct, contact us so we can investigate further.
Peer Review Report and Editorial Decision-Making Process
Peer review takes four weeks on average, although longer or shorter periods are sometimes seen owing to factors such as the time of year, your manuscript’s subject area, and the availability of reviewers. The editorial decision on your manuscript will be carried out by the journal’s Editor in Chief, Deputy Editor in Chief, an Associate Editor, or on rare occasions, by a member of the journal’s Editorial Board. The decision will incorporate the peer reviewers’ comments into their decision. Once this is complete, the peer review report for your manuscript will be immediately sent to you. The decision will be (i) to revise and resubmit your manuscript based on reviewer comment for re-evaluation, (ii) accept pending the authors adequately addressing reviewer and editor concerns, (iii) immediate acceptance without further revisions, or (iv) reject as the manuscript does not meet the journal’s acceptance criteria or, if the manuscript was a resubmission, because peer reviewer comments have not been adequately addressed.
In cases where the decision-maker requests changes to the manuscript based on reviewer comments and if authors repeatedly fail to respond to reviewers’ recommendations, then the paper may be rejected at this stage
Read more about how to prepare a revised manuscript here.
After the Final Editorial Decision
If your paper is accepted subject to the authors making the changes described in the peer review report to the editorial decision-maker’s satisfaction, the final editorial decision is considered to be the one when the editorial decision-maker accepts the paper for publication. The decision-maker may request further changes before making a final decision to accept the paper for publication, and if authors repeatedly fail to respond to reviewers’ recommendations then the paper may be rejected at this stage. After the final editorial decision the paper will move into production after any applicable fees are paid.
For papers accepted by the editorial decision-maker immediately following peer review without any changes being required, this acceptance constitutes the final editorial decision and the paper moves into production after any applicable fees are paid.
If your paper is rejected then processing halts following the editorial decision. You may resubmit your paper to another journal if you wish. In some circumstances it may be possible to re-submit the manuscript if the recommendations made by the reviewers are first addressed. In this case your paper will be subject to peer review again.
The SAGE Production Process
Communication: We are conscious of, and understand, how keen authors are to see their work published. SAGE Production Editors maintain regular communication with journal editors and authors throughout the production process.
Proofs: We will email a PDF of the proofs to the corresponding author. Please return corrected proofs as soon as possible, or by the deadline requested, so as not to delay the publication process.
SAGE Production: At SAGE we place an extremely strong emphasis on the highest possible production standards. We attach a great deal of importance to our quality service levels in copy-editing, typesetting, printing, and online publication. We also seek to uphold excellent author relations throughout the publication process.
We value your feedback to ensure we continue to improve our author service levels. On publication all corresponding authors will receive a brief survey questionnaire on your experience of publishing with SAGE. Do take the time to complete this as we are responsive to your comments, and they are valued highly by our journal editors.
Open access continuous publication: Many open access journals operate on a continuous publication model where articles are posted online as soon as they have completed the production process in a fully citable form. At this time articles are free to view and download for all. As there are no issues to fill and no page count constraints, the time to publication is often quick. Check the 'Latest Articles' tab on the journal website for the latest published content. Articles are batched periodically (every month, quarter or year), and are then available on the 'Archive' tab on the journal website.
Promoting your article: If you think your article may be suitable for promotion, please flag this to the journal editor or your production contact at SAGE as early as possible in the publishing process. We have a variety of different promotional channels at our disposal to ensure your article reaches the widest possible audience. See Promote Your Journal for more information.
Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision