Close
Help




JOURNAL

Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment

A Peer Support Scale for Adults Treated for Psychoactive Substance–Use Disorder: A Rasch Analysis

Submit a Paper


Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment 2015:9 81-86

Original Research

Published on 07 Oct 2015

DOI: 10.4137/SART.S25149


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment

Abstract

The literature suggests that peer support is protective of relapse for adults treated for substance-use disorder. However, to our knowledge there is no standard measure of peer support. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to use Rasch analysis to assess a 13-item peer support scale used in a group of adults treated for primary psychoactive substance–abuse disorder. The participants (n = 408) are adults who were discharged from an inpatient substance-abuse treatment program from five successive years, 2004–2009. Overall, it is acceptable to surmise that items 1–12 are part of the same dimension for the 13-item scale. Given the prominence of therapeutic communities as a mode of primary treatment and the importance of peer support, it is important to both the academic and treatment communities to have a standard way to measure peer support. The scale presented here can be useful for this purpose.

Highlights:

• We asses a peer support scale for those treated for substance abuse.

• We examine characteristics of the peer support scale.

• We provide an option to measure peer support for those treated for substance abuse.



Downloads

PDF  (435.07 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




What Your Colleagues Say About Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment
I very much enjoyed the experience of publishing with Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment.  The editorial and review staff were very helpful and understanding throughout, even when a very large and complex project was being undertaken, and a range of subjects had to be reviewed.  The editor was sympathetic and understanding of the author's responses, and this combined and coordinated interplay has allowed major conceptual advances to be made with major implications for the improvement ...
Dr Stuart Reece (School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services